• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
A senior Iranian source said that Irans "defense capabilities," including its missile program, are not within the scope of negotiations.On April 20, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jia-kun held a regular press conference. On the afternoon of April 19, 36,000 people in Japan rallied around the Diet building to strongly protest the Takaichi Sanae governments attempt to amend the constitution. Protesters held signs reading "Oppose War," "Dont Violate Article 9 of the Constitution," and "Takaichi Resign," calling for the protection of the pacifist constitution. What is the spokespersons comment on this? Guo Jia-kun responded: "We have also noticed that Japans constitutional amendment movement has aroused increasing doubt and opposition within Japan, among its Asian neighbors, and in the international community." Guo Jia-kun pointed out that Japanese militarism committed atrocities against the people of China and other Asian countries, and also brought profound suffering to the Japanese people. Therefore, the issue of Japanese constitutional amendment concerns the post-war international order and Japans future, and has always received high attention from the international community and its Asian neighbors. However, Japan has so far failed to deeply and thoroughly reflect on its history of aggression, and some forces are even attempting to glorify and whitewash its crimes of aggression, pushing Japan to accelerate its "remilitarization," leading to the rise of a new type of militarism that threatens regional peace and stability. The international community should be highly vigilant about this. "Preventing the resurgence of militarism is Japans due obligation and the firm will of the international community, including China. We urge Japan to learn from history, abide by its international obligations, and adhere to the path of peaceful development," Guo Jiakun said.Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Bagaei: There are currently no plans for a second round of negotiations with the United States.On April 20th, the Federation of German Industries (FDI) stated on Monday that it expects German industrial performance to stagnate at best in 2026, warning that rising energy costs, supply chain risks, and domestic structural weaknesses are putting pressure on Europes largest economy. The organization lowered its outlook after a weak start to the year, citing new downside risks from the Iranian conflict, including rising energy costs, broader inflationary pressures, and disruptions to shipping and logistics. FDI President Peter Leibinger stated, "German industrial output has declined year after year since 2022. For 2026, we no longer expect a recovery, but rather stagnation." The organization noted that if shipping disruptions continue, German manufacturing could even contract for the fifth consecutive year. Leibinger added that industrial output remains well below previous levels, with capacity utilization only slightly above 78%. He further pointed out that Germanys weakness is primarily structural, citing high labor, tax, bureaucratic, and energy costs as factors that have eroded the countrys competitiveness.Iranian Foreign Minister Araqchi: Iran will do its utmost to safeguard its national interests and security.

Bear Market Leading Indicator Signals Potential Sharp Move Ahead

Cory Russell

May 09, 2022 10:56


微信截图_20220418111005.png


In January 2022, the S&P 500 dropped more than 10%, which was seen as an indication of weakness because to a Wyckoff distribution topping formation. Nonetheless, this leading indicator – Russell 2000 around the end of November 2021, at least 1 month before the S&P 500 had a steep plunge of more than 10% - offered many red signals as an early warning.


In 2019, the Russell 2000 will be a bearish leading indicator.


Russell 2000 failed the backup action from September 26 to October 1, 2019, with a break down, test, and confirmation (highlighted in orange circle) of the intermediate support level at 1700, while the S&P 500 attempted a breakout, as indicated in the chart below.


With a bearish momentum bar (second orange circle) on 10 October 2019, Russell 2000 dropped below the support of the swing low at 1630, but S&P 500 failed to break out. As the Russell 2000 led the market down, these two incidents acted as early warning signs of market weakness.


Following that, the Russell 2000 fell below the 1460 support level, tested the support-turned-resistance level, and then reversed from 7-14 December 2019 (third orange circle) to begin the Christmas selloff. Despite the S&P 500 testing support, the Russell 2000 collapse was a leading signal (highlighted in orange circle). Similar to Russell 2000, the S&P 500 eventually broke down and had a 10% selloff in six sessions.


With Russell 2000, you may anticipate the S&P 500's selloff.


As illustrated in the chart below, Russell 2000 futures suffered a failure of backup action on November 26, 2021, when the negative momentum bar (highlighted in orange circles) committed below the resistance-turned-support around 2310.


The failure was notable since it sparked the greatest down wave inside the trading range of 2100-2300. The down wave's large supply was an indication of weakness, since there was distribution on the way down, signaling the start of distribution.


This is a variant of the typical Wyckoff distribution pattern, in which the bearish bias emerges immediately after the first evidence of weakness. To learn how to analyze the bearish structure with volume and when it will be breached, watch the Wyckoff distribution analysis video for the S&P 500.


S&P 500 futures only started to develop a distribution structure as a topping formation, whereas Russell 2000 formed the initial hint of weakness (annotated as SOW0) followed by a re-distribution structure. The Russell 2000 led the way down before the S&P 500 as small cap equities were spread, which was the first red signal.


The second red flag as an early warning of the market selloff came on January 18, 2022, when Russell 2000 broke down from the re-distribution structure (annotated in pink rectangle), which also coincided with the support level at 2100 from the broad trading range that began in March 2021.


Following the break down, another wave of selling (annotated as SOW1) began in Russell 2000, while the S&P 500 saw its first correction (annotated as SOW0) of more than 10% off the top.


From January 24, 2022 until the present, another probable re-distribution structure has emerged. Russell 2000 broke down support at 1900 in the last two weeks, followed by two unsuccessful efforts to rally back up, while the S&P 500 was still testing the support region, which was identical to the scenario described above for 2019. Russell 2000 has issued yet another early warning about market weakness.