EUR/USD 1.16589
-0.037%
Gold 4625.44
-0.564%
Oil 84.120
-0.510%
USD/JPY 159.468
0.236%
GBP/USD 1.36333
0.022%
GBP/JPY 217.412
0.266%
Browse More
  • English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On August 25th, the Swedish central bank released the latest meeting minutes, indicating that if higher-than-expected inflation this summer proves sustainable, the policy rate may still be raised later this year. The bank previously decided to maintain the rate at 1.75% at its most recent meeting. Swedish central bank governor Töreden stated in the minutes, "I judge that our next policy rate adjustment needs to be a rate hike. However, the timing of the hike remains uncertain." The mixed economic outlook for Sweden presents a challenging task for the Swedish central bank. Overall inflation is low, at only 0.7% year-on-year in July. Despite some economic recovery, business pricing plans remain moderate, oil prices have retreated from their peak, and the labor market remains weak. However, some worrying factors exist. Overall inflation was boosted by temporary tax cuts in an election year, while underlying price pressures were higher than expected during the summer. Furthermore, the Middle East conflict could still spread and lead to higher domestic prices in Sweden.According to Japans Kyodo News, Japans debt servicing costs will increase by 17.1% in fiscal year 2027/28, reaching a record 36.6386 trillion yen.According to Japans Kyodo News, Japans Ministry of Finance has requested a budget of 38.7 trillion yen.According to Interfax news agency, Kazakhstan has begun supplying small quantities of gasoline to Russia.The Swedish central banks meeting minutes revealed that Governor Töden believes the next policy rate adjustment will require an interest rate hike. However, the timing remains uncertain. He stressed the need for vigilance regarding rising inflation.

Owning Government Officials From Working on Regulation

Cory Russell

Jul 07, 2022 16:31

微信截图_20220707162601.png


Government personnel who actively engage in cryptocurrencies or are discovered to be in possession of any are prohibited from taking part in the creation of legislation and policies pertaining to cryptocurrencies, according to a recent directive from the US Office of Government Ethics.

With Some Exceptions

Additionally, the advisory notice made clear that even if the restriction is in effect, it only does so with a de minimis exception.


Owners are still able to invest in cryptocurrencies via publicly listed shares and mutual funds of businesses offering cryptocurrency and blockchain services because to this exception. Stablecoins and all other forms of cryptocurrency are included.


Government personnel are still permitted to acquire cryptocurrencies; but, doing so will prevent them from contributing to the development of crypto-related regulations.


They may still work on such initiatives, however, provided they divert their cryptocurrency holdings into other financial opportunities.


The notification went on to further describe the situation, saying "An employee may not engage in a specific topic if the employee understands that particular item might have a direct and predictable influence on the value of their cryptocurrency or stablecoins."


However, even for those who are permitted to invest in cryptocurrency-related stock index listings, a $50k threshold has been imposed over which the de minimis exemption is no longer applicable.

Crypto investors suffer a loss

The cryptocurrency market isn't in the greatest of health right now, even if the Biden administration is concentrating on creating laws for cryptocurrencies after the POTUS issued an executive order for the same.


The continued bearishness is having an impact on cryptocurrency firms as the overall market value of all cryptocurrencies is struggling to reach $1 trillion.


Voyager Digital has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy a week after stopping the platform's withdrawal, trading, and deposit services after Harmony almost went bankrupt a while back.


Thus, even without the US GOE's decision, it would only have taken these investors a little longer to leave the market, similar to how many other investors are already doing.

Suggestion