• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On July 25th, Dalian City introduced a new policy of temporary interest subsidies for housing provident fund loans. For second-home housing provident fund loans approved between July 24, 2026, and December 31, 2027, a subsidy of up to 15% of the actual interest will be provided for a maximum period of three years, specifically to reduce the repayment pressure on those seeking to upgrade their homes. Nationwide, nearly 90 cities have successively introduced various housing subsidies and loan burden reduction measures this year, continuously enriching the toolbox of local policies to stabilize the housing market. However, Dalians approach of providing financial subsidies for second-home housing provident fund loans is a relatively rare exploration in recent times.Russian Ministry of Defense: Russian air defense systems shot down 328 Ukrainian drones overnight.On July 25th, Nvidia (NVDA.O) CEO Jensen Huang made his first appearance on Elon Musks social media platform X. His first tweet was a letter co-signed by Nvidia, emphasizing the importance of open-source AI models. Musk retweeted the post, saying, "Huang is right, I fully support him."Kuwait Petroleum CEO: We welcome Blackstone, Brookfield and KKR as long-term investors in the Peregrine Project.Samsung Electronics and Broadcom have signed a memorandum of understanding covering collaboration in memory chips, foundry services, and advanced packaging up to $200 billion by 2030. Samsung Electronics will partner with Broadcom to develop Broadcoms next-generation AI accelerator based on Samsungs HBM technology. Samsung Electronics will provide sub-2nm foundry processes and advanced packaging solutions.

Lawsuit accuses troubled crypto lender Celsius Network of fraud

Skylar Shaw

Jul 08, 2022 14:54

微信截图_20220708144808.png


On Thursday, a former investment manager at Celsius Network filed a lawsuit against the cryptocurrency lender, alleging that it had frozen client funds and had rigged the price of its own cryptocurrency token using user contributions.


According to the lawsuit, Celsius engaged in "gross mishandling of client deposits" in order to enrich itself and deceived plaintiff KeyFi Inc, controlled by former manager Jason Stone, into delivering services worth millions of dollars while refusing to pay for them.


The complaint was filed in Manhattan's New York state court and demands both specific compensation and punitive damages; Celsius has not yet responded.


Stone's charges come after Celsius decided on June 12 to halt transfers and withdrawals for its 1.7 million clients due to "extreme" market circumstances.


Later, the Hoboken, New Jersey-based business recruited consultants to discuss a potential debt restructure that would include declaring bankruptcy.


While the cryptocurrency hedge fund went into liquidation late last month, the crypto lender Voyager Digital Ltd filed for bankruptcy protection this week.


Celsius guaranteed retail consumers disproportionate returns, up to 19% yearly.


However, Stone said that Celsius had trouble paying investors because it neglected to hedge its bets, leading to "severe" losses when the value of several currencies changed.


He also claimed that Celsius had a $100 million to $200 million hole in its records that it "could not completely explain or rectify" because certain deposits were recorded on a U.S. dollar basis even though clients were paid in bitcoin or other digital currencies.


The case filed on Thursday claims that Stone produced $838 million in profit for Celsius and KeyFi before expenses and overhead from August 2020 to March 2021 while mostly operating without a formal agreement, with KeyFi being entitled to 20% of net profit.


When it became apparent that the hedging difficulties "may be financially ruinous" for Celsius and harm KeyFi's image, Stone claims he ended the connection in March 2021. However, Stone claims that Celsius has refused to accept his resignation.


KeyFi Inc. v. Celsius Network Ltd. et al., New York State Supreme Court, New York County, is the name of the case.