• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On December 7, the African Union (AU) and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) issued separate statements strongly condemning the attempted coup in Benin that day. The AU statement said that any form of military intervention in a political process is a serious violation of the AUs fundamental principles and values. AU Commission Chairperson Yusuf called on all those involved in the coup attempt to immediately cease all illegal actions and fully comply with the Benin Constitution. The ECOWAS statement said that the coup attempt violated the Benin Constitution, and ECOWAS commended the Benin government and its armed forces for their efforts to control the situation.French President Macron: Monetary policy should take into account employment and economic growth.On December 7th, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy posted on his official social media platform that Russia had launched over 1,600 drones, approximately 1,200 guided-missile bombs, and nearly 70 missiles of various types at Ukraine this week alone. Zelenskyy stated that on the 7th, the Russian military attacked Ukraine with over 240 drones and 5 ballistic missiles. Seven regions in Ukraine were damaged, with casualties reported in some areas. He indicated that Ukraine continues to cooperate with its partners to strengthen its defenses. Currently, Russia has not responded to this.The Russian Ministry of Defense stated that Russian forces launched a coordinated attack last night on Ukraines transportation infrastructure, fuel and energy facilities, and long-range drone bases.According to RIA Novosti: Russian troops have occupied Kucherivka in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine.

Lawsuit accuses troubled crypto lender Celsius Network of fraud

Skylar Shaw

Jul 08, 2022 14:54

微信截图_20220708144808.png


On Thursday, a former investment manager at Celsius Network filed a lawsuit against the cryptocurrency lender, alleging that it had frozen client funds and had rigged the price of its own cryptocurrency token using user contributions.


According to the lawsuit, Celsius engaged in "gross mishandling of client deposits" in order to enrich itself and deceived plaintiff KeyFi Inc, controlled by former manager Jason Stone, into delivering services worth millions of dollars while refusing to pay for them.


The complaint was filed in Manhattan's New York state court and demands both specific compensation and punitive damages; Celsius has not yet responded.


Stone's charges come after Celsius decided on June 12 to halt transfers and withdrawals for its 1.7 million clients due to "extreme" market circumstances.


Later, the Hoboken, New Jersey-based business recruited consultants to discuss a potential debt restructure that would include declaring bankruptcy.


While the cryptocurrency hedge fund went into liquidation late last month, the crypto lender Voyager Digital Ltd filed for bankruptcy protection this week.


Celsius guaranteed retail consumers disproportionate returns, up to 19% yearly.


However, Stone said that Celsius had trouble paying investors because it neglected to hedge its bets, leading to "severe" losses when the value of several currencies changed.


He also claimed that Celsius had a $100 million to $200 million hole in its records that it "could not completely explain or rectify" because certain deposits were recorded on a U.S. dollar basis even though clients were paid in bitcoin or other digital currencies.


The case filed on Thursday claims that Stone produced $838 million in profit for Celsius and KeyFi before expenses and overhead from August 2020 to March 2021 while mostly operating without a formal agreement, with KeyFi being entitled to 20% of net profit.


When it became apparent that the hedging difficulties "may be financially ruinous" for Celsius and harm KeyFi's image, Stone claims he ended the connection in March 2021. However, Stone claims that Celsius has refused to accept his resignation.


KeyFi Inc. v. Celsius Network Ltd. et al., New York State Supreme Court, New York County, is the name of the case.