• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On January 30th, Trump turned the selection process for the Federal Reserve Chair into a game show, with Kevin Warshs ultimate victory being arguably the most unexpected choice. This decision is bound to exacerbate market volatility and may displease all parties, including Trump himself. This nomination will first trigger a strong cognitive conflict on Wall Street and in policy circles. Although Trump promised to choose a Fed Chair capable of implementing loose monetary policy, Warsh has always been considered a hawk. This background will make it difficult for Warsh to build credibility. If he chooses to cut interest rates, the market will see him as abandoning principles and submitting to Trumps puppet; if he maintains high interest rates for too long, he will inevitably clash with Trump quickly, which in itself will trigger market volatility. Before Powells term ends, Warshs "shadow term" has already begun, potentially leading to confused policy signals and market misinterpretations. Intriguingly, Warshs victory seems to stem from a "survivors logic." When the Trump team lost interest in Hassett, he became the only remaining option. Until December of last year, Hassett was still the top favorite in the forecasting market, but concerns that his nomination could drive up bond term premiums, coupled with warnings from Wall Street executives that someone too close to the president should not be in charge of an independent central bank, eventually changed the situation.On January 30th, Federal Reserve Governor Waller stated that the current interest rate range is 3.50%-3.75%, and monetary policy should be closer to a neutral level, which he believes is around 3%. Despite robust economic growth, the labor market remains weak. Waller expects last years weak employment data to be revised downwards, reflecting near-zero job growth in 2025. He stated that he has heard of several companies planning layoffs in 2026, and therefore is quite skeptical about job growth, warning of a significant risk of a sharp deterioration in employment. Regarding inflation, Waller pointed out that the inflation rate excluding tariffs is close to the Feds 2% target and is on track to reach it. Although inflation has risen due to tariffs, he believes that given that inflation expectations have stabilized, monetary policy should ignore these temporary effects. Waller voted against a 25 basis point rate cut at this weeks meeting, arguing that current policy is still excessively suppressing economic activity.On January 30th, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Dmitry Lyubinsky stated that Germany has completely refused to purchase energy from Russia, and there is currently no possibility of resuming energy dialogue with Germany. Lyubinsky said that to "accommodate" certain political situations, Germany has completely refused to purchase coal, oil, petroleum products, and pipeline natural gas from Russia, and Russia currently sees no prospect of resuming normal energy dialogue with Germany. Lyubinsky said that Russia had indicated its willingness to resume gas supplies to Germany through the currently intact Nord Stream pipeline branch, provided Germany expressed its willingness, but Germany has not responded. Lyubinsky emphasized that Germanys choice will damage its own economy.Federal Reserve Governor Waller: Monetary policy should be closer to a neutral level, which is likely around 3%, while the current interest rate range is 3.50%–3.75%.Federal Reserve Governor Waller: Despite robust economic growth, the labor market remains weak.

Stock Markets Break 50 Day EMA

Alice Wang

Jul 21, 2022 15:45

微信截图_20220721151813.png

Technical Analysis of the S&P 500

On Wednesday during trade, the S&P 500 raised its head over the 50 Day EMA, which is obviously a little success. Since there was a lot of noise between this level and the 4000 level, I believe it makes some sense that there was some hesitancy. However, I believe we have a good chance of reaching close to the 4100 level if we can break over the 4000 mark.


Looking at this chart, it would be very negative indeed if we were to reverse course and drop below the 3900 level, indicating that possibly the breakthrough was a false one. However, if we do rally, I believe we will continue to "climb the wall of anxiety" in an upward direction. Position sizing will be essential since, in any case, I believe the only thing you can probably bet on is a lot of loud behavior. It will be fascinating to see how this develops over time given that this is a violent short-covering rally.


Given the abundance of bad news now available, any collapse will likely gain a lot of momentum.


However, markets cannot continue to decline indefinitely, so this relief rally does have some logic. I believe we are in a position where we must see this through the lens of the longer-term probabilities, which continue to lead to reduced pricing over the long run. Whether or not it is a sustainable rally is an entirely separate thing. There may also be some short covering since the Federal Reserve will meet the following week.