• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
April 30th - According to the Financial Times, the Bank of England has expressed concern about plans to cut capital requirements for specialized trading firms, a move that has created disagreements with other UK regulators. This disagreement stems from a proposal by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) late last year to relax capital rules for trading firms it regulates, aiming to improve liquidity in financial markets. Multiple sources familiar with the matter indicated that the Bank of England is skeptical, with officials worried that the move could weaken the resilience of large trading firms during crises, thereby increasing risks to financial stability. Over the past decade, trading firms have reshaped the trading landscape on Wall Street, surpassing large banks such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs. Unlike large banks, these firms are not subject to a complex set of regulatory requirements designed to ensure they have sufficient capital in the event of market losses or deposit runs.According to Hong Kong Stock Exchange documents, Shenzhen Fiyland Technology Group Co., Ltd. has submitted a listing application to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.According to the Financial Times, the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) are locked in a standoff over the capital requirements for trading firms. The Bank of England has expressed concern over plans to reduce capital requirements for professional trading firms.SpaceX: 24 Starlink satellites have been confirmed for deployment.Unitree unveils Unitree dual-armed humanoid robot, priced from 26,900 yuan.

Attorney-Client Privilege: US Court in Google Case Wants More Details

Charlie Brooks

Apr 13, 2022 09:41

U2.png


Judge Amit Mehta said last week that he was unsure if he has the authority to penalize a firm for conduct committed prior to the filing of the complaint. Mehta urged the government and Google on Tuesday to name any incidents that bolstered their arguments for or against the penalties.


Additionally, Mehta directed Google to generate a random sample of 210 emails from the 21,000 for evaluation.


"Once the court has completed its examination, it will consider whether an order forcing disclosure of the whole collection of contested emails or some other course of action is appropriate," Mehta said in his ruling.


The Justice Department sued Google in 2020, alleging that the company violated antitrust rules in its management of its search business. The trial has been scheduled for September 2023.