• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On April 3rd, Futures News reported that silver prices have been trending downwards and rebounding since March. As of April 2nd, the domestic spot price of #1 silver was 18,150 yuan/kg, a cumulative decrease of 25.7% compared to the beginning of March. The main driver was negative news, specifically the turmoil in the Middle East, which led the market to price in expectations of subsequent energy supply tightening, thus increasing concerns about inflation. The Federal Reserve shifted its stance from one rate cut this year to the possibility of a rate hike, putting pressure on silver. However, Powells subsequent statement suggesting maintaining interest rates and the release of some conciliatory signals between the US and Iran led to a correction in market expectations for rate cuts. Domestically, with the export tax rebate period for photovoltaic modules approaching, the downstream rush to produce and export has largely ended. Coupled with the weakness in new energy vehicles and price volatility weakening market investment demand, the fundamentals are under overall pressure. Going forward, continued attention needs to be paid to the direction of the Middle East situation and its impact on the Federal Reserves interest rate path. Silver volatility may increase, and it is recommended to invest cautiously based on ones own risk tolerance.On April 3, Hong Leong Investment Bank, in a report, pointed out that the Malaysian economy may be under pressure due to temporary energy supply disruptions caused by the conflict with Iran, and therefore lowered its 2026 GDP growth forecast from 4.7% to 4.5%. Although Malaysian ships were recently granted free passage through the Strait of Hormuz, analysts believe that the risk of oil supply shortages cannot be completely ignored. However, strong exports of electronic products and continued consumer demand will support growth. Due to rising commodity costs and adverse weather conditions, RON97 fuel oil, unsubsidized diesel, electricity, and food are facing upward price pressure, and Hong Leong Investment Bank raised its 2026 CPI growth forecast from 1.7% to 2.0%. Given the rising inflation risks and slowing growth prospects, analysts added that the Central Bank of Malaysia is likely to maintain the policy rate at 2.75% when assessing the impact of the conflict.April 3 - According to a CNN report on April 2, US intelligence assessments indicate that despite five weeks of US-Israeli military action against Iran, approximately half of Irans missile launchers remain intact, and it possesses thousands of suicide drones. The report, citing sources, states that the main reason Irans missile launchers have not been severely damaged is their ability to be moved underground. Furthermore, Irans use of mobile platforms for "hit-and-run" tactics makes tracking these launchers extremely difficult. Sources say that in addition to existing missile launchers, Iran still maintains a large stockpile of missiles. Moreover, the operational capability of Irans coastal cruise missiles is likely largely intact.On April 3rd, Xiaomi announced that due to the continued sharp rise in the prices of key components such as global memory chips, after careful evaluation, the company will adjust the suggested retail price of some of its products starting from 00:00 on April 11, 2026. Xiaomi President Lu Weibing stated on social media that the current round of memory price increases far exceeded expectations, with the price of the same version of memory soaring nearly four times compared to Q1 of last year. The 12+512GB version has increased by approximately 1500 yuan, and the 16+1TB version has seen an even more outrageous increase, which has significantly impacted REDMI, a brand that has always been known for its extremely cost-effective pricing. Therefore, we have had to make a slight increase or restore the original price for some models.On April 3rd, it was reported that the National Innovation Center for Optoelectronics, the National Key Laboratory of Optical Communication Technology and Networks, and Pengcheng Laboratory jointly developed a multifunctional programmable optoelectronic fusion gate array system (P-FPGA) – LightIN. This system consists of a programmable photonic chip, an electronic control module, and a test-compile-adjust (TCA) intelligent configuration framework, enabling multiple functions such as photonic computing acceleration, signal processing, network switching, and security encryption. The related findings were published in Nature sub-journal Light: Science & Applications 15:165.

Are US tech giants the new Nifty Fifty?

LEO

Oct 25, 2021 13:27

漂亮50封面.jpg

Photo: Internet


The COVID-19 hit the global economy this year, but under the leadership of technology giants such as Apple, Tesla, Amazon, Alphabet, Facebook, and Microsoft, the Nasdaq Index continues to set new record highs. 


Tesla, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and other highfliers now look a lot like the 'Nifty Fifty' bubble stocks of the 1970s.


Nifty Fifty


In the United States, the term Nifty Fifty was an informal designation for fifty popular large-cap stocks on the New York Stock Exchange in the 1960s and 1970s that were widely regarded as solid buy and hold growth stocks or "Blue-chip" stocks. 


These 50 stocks include Coca-Cola, Walt Disney, IBM, Philip Morris, McDonald's, etc.


The world back then was their oyster. These were one-rule stocks — and that rule was to buy them at any price. They were great companies and how much you paid for them was irrelevant until it wasn't.


Dot-com bubble


The dot-com bubble began when internet browser provider Netscape joined the tech-focused Nasdaq stock exchange on 9 August 1995. This loss-making company, which had only been founded in 1994, made its stock market debut at US$ 28 per share. During the first day of trading, the share price hit almost US$ 75 at times. Anything internet related that had '.com' or 'e-' in its name went down a storm with investors from the mid-1990s onwards, regardless of whether there was a robust business model behind it or not. Investors became greedy when faced with making huge gains from the seemingly endless worldwide web.


These inflated expectations reached their peak at the start of 2000. The Nasdaq Composite index had grown fivefold in five years. 


When the tech bubble finally burst in March 2000, trillions of market value went up in smoke. In this phase of disillusionment, the Nasdaq fell by almost 80% and closed at 1,114.11 points on 9 October 2002.


Dot-com bubble 2.0?


At their peak, the Nifty Fifty comprised almost all the gains of the S&P 500. If that fact sounds eerily familiar,  that's because today's Nifty Fifty are Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Alphabet, Microsoft, and Tesla.


Just like the Nifty Fifty of yore, these stocks are dominant companies of their day. They touch every aspect of our lives. Also, they have strong brand strength, frantic buying by investors.


Like a SpaceX rocket lofting a Tesla Roadster into orbit, Tesla stock is on a vertical trip into outer space. 


In 2019, Tesla's stock price has risen by about 800%, and it has risen by more than 330% since the beginning of 2020. Some analysts believe that Tesla is 'one of the most dangerous stocks' on Wall Street.


特斯拉股价.png

Photo: Finviz


The debate over Tesla's stock price has never stopped.


Tesla stock bulls typically argue that the company is dominating the nascent global electric vehicle market, and comparing the stock and its valuation to legacy auto stocks is irrelevant. 


Tesla bears often point out that the stock's valuation is extremely high, even compared with high-growth tech stocks, and Tesla will face an unprecedented wave of new competition in the next couple of years.


It may have a wonderful, viable business for many years to come, but the natural competition of the marketplace makes it extraordinarily difficult for any company to remain dominant for perpetuity. That's why valuation matters.


If investors held many of the Nifty Fifty stocks from 1972 to 1992, they would have delivered a decent (10%-plus) return. This sounds great in theory, but most investors would have lost patience after ten years of zero- or negative return. Put another way, the shareholders who bought these stocks in 1972 were most likely not the ones who profited from them in 1992.

The Nifty Fifty showed us that a company's greatness and past growth are not enough is still true. Starting valuation, what you actually pay for a business has always mattered and still does.


Warren Buffett once said that it is wise for investors to be "fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful."