• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
The Hang Seng Tech Index rose 1%, with Hua Hong Semiconductor (01347.HK) leading the gains with a nearly 5% increase.On September 18, Qatari Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Al-Khulaifi visited the International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Netherlands on September 17 to discuss a legal response under international law to the Israeli attack on Doha. Al-Khulaifi held separate talks with ICC President and Judge Tomoko Akane and Deputy Prosecutor Nazat, focusing on the recent Israeli attack on Doha. Al-Khulaifi reiterated that Israels actions constituted a blatant violation of Qatars sovereignty and that its crimes must be punished under international criminal law. Qatar remains steadfast in its resolve to defend its rights through all legal avenues.The Hang Seng Index in Hong Kong opened at 26,863.69 points, down 44.7 points, or 0.17%, on September 18 (Thursday); the Hang Seng Tech Index in Hong Kong opened at 6,334.32 points, up 0.08 points, or 0.0%, on September 18 (Thursday); the CSI 300 Index opened at 9,574.74 points, down 22.03 points, or 0.23%, on September 18 (Thursday); and the H-share Index opened at 4,322.54 points, up 3.0 points, or 0.07%.At the Hong Kong stock market opening, the Hang Seng Index fell 0.17%, while the Sci-Tech Index opened flat. Tech stocks continued to be active, with Baidu (09888.HK) rising 3.05%. Kaisa Capital (00936.HK) rose 14.5%, as the company undergoes strategic transformation and expands its real-world asset (RWA) tokenization business.Eddie Yue, Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority: The pace of future US interest rate cuts remains uncertain, and short-term Hong Kong interest rates are affected by the supply and demand of funds.

Hershey, Nestle, and Cargill win the dismissal of a claim of child slavery in the United States

Charlie Brooks

Jun 29, 2022 11:06


Tuesday, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. dismissed a case brought by eight Malians claiming child slavery on Ivory Coast cocoa plantations against Hershey Co (NYSE:HSY), Nestle SA (SIX:NESN), Cargill Inc, and others.


U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich determined that the proposed class action plaintiffs lacked legal standing to sue because they failed to prove a "traceable nexus" between the seven defendant companies and the individual farms where the plaintiffs worked.


She added that the plaintiffs did not adequately explain the role of intermediaries in the cocoa supply chain, and that the companies did not oversee actions in "free zones" where 70 to 80 percent of cocoa is farmed.


Mali and Ivory Coast share a border in West Africa.


The plaintiffs claimed they were trafficked as children after being approached by strangers who promised them employment for which they would be compensated, but did not pay them, threatened them with starvation if they did not work, and forced them to live in squalor.


Their attorney, Terry Collingsworth, said that the plaintiffs plan to file an appeal to "compel the businesses to keep their agreements and put an end to this dreadful system they have created."


Other defendants included Mars Inc, Mondelez International Inc (NASDAQ:MDLZ), Barry Callebaut AG, and Olam International Ltd.


In court filings, the seven defendants said that they "strongly abhor the practice of forced labor" and that they were addressing non-forced child labor in cocoa supply chains.


However, they contended that the plaintiffs' too broad legal theory may hold too many parties liable for forced child labor, including consumers and merchants who would benefit from lower prices.


In accordance with the Reauthorization of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, the plaintiffs filed suit.


The Supreme Court of the United States rejected a similar case brought by six Malians against Cargill and Nestle under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 in June of last year.


This was the most recent in a line of judgments denying access to federal courts based on human rights breaches occurring outside the United States.


Coubaly et al. v. Cargill Inc. et al., U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, case number 21-00386.