As it avoids requests to slash taxes on banks or remove restrictions on employing foreign personnel to keep up with competitors, Britain's post-Brexit financial services reform is more about keeping up with them than launching a "Big Bang 2.0."
As it avoids requests to slash taxes on banks or loosen restrictions on employing foreign personnel to remain London a powerhouse in global finance, Britain's post-Brexit financial services reform is more about keeping up with competitors than unleashing a "Big Bang 2.0."
Wednesday's financial services legislation was unveiled by UK finance minister Nadhim Zahawi in front of a group of bankers in London's famed City financial sector on Tuesday night.
The long-delayed changes were branded a "Big Bang 2.0" by Rishi Sunak, Zahawi's predecessor and a candidate for the Conservative Party leadership. Sunak was alluding to the deregulation of stock trading in the 1980s, which put the City of London at the center of Europe's financial sector.
However, several of the bill's key provisions—including regulating stablecoins and relaxing insurance capital rules—repeat actions previously done by the European Union, disappointing some who hoped for a quicker, more significant transformation of the British financial sector.
"The new Bill is a crucial first step toward a common law-based regulatory reform in the UK, providing for a liberal yet secure regulatory environment. But this is only the beginning, said Barney Reynolds, a partner and the firm's global head of the financial services industry group.
The lucrative European Union market has been mostly closed off to the City since Brexit. Despite the steady migration of employment to the continent and the loss of equities and derivatives trading volumes to cities like Amsterdam and Paris, it still has a commanding lead as Europe's biggest financial center by a significant margin.
Critics claim that the law won't undo such modifications.
By quitting the single market of the EU The world's greatest integrated retail market, which is just outside its door, has been shut off from it. That fundamental truth won't be altered by anything in this measure, according to Nicolas Mackel, CEO of Luxembourg for Finance, a development organization representing the nation's financial center.
Brexit supporters had claimed that leaving the EU would offer Britain the chance to create a brand-new set of rules that would not only solidify London's position as Europe's premier financial center but also exclude New York and Asian financial hubs like Singapore and Hong Kong from market dominance.
However, Britain has chosen not to quickly repeal a levy enacted during the financial crisis on bank balance sheets or to relax "ring fencing" regulations that force institutions with sizable domestic retail businesses to reserve "rainy-day" capital that might otherwise be used to increase profits.
It has kept in place restrictions on banker bonuses that the Bank of England has long opposed and is maintaining a system for holding top management responsible for misbehavior that occurred under their watch.
A banking sector source observed that "there is a divide between the rhetoric and reality," referring to the expected public reaction against such actions amid the present cost of living crisis.
No rush
For the time being, it seems that British legislators won't be pushed into taking any action that sets the industry apart from other sources of foreign investment.
Global banks, whose presence underpins London's influence, and many start-ups that depend on the free flow of finance and people to fuel their worldwide operations, do not want multiple sets of laws that depart from international standards since this raises costs.
For the time being, emerging fintech companies that choose to base themselves in Britain will have to make do with government promises to expedite worker visas.
According to Graham Bishop, a former banker who has advised the EU on regulation, "the scope for the UK to create anything genuinely fresh is fairly low since God is on the side of the major battalions in regulation, the EU and United States."
Richard Gardner, CEO of the American IT company Modulus, expressed concern that Britain would "double down on newfound independence" and overturn supervisory norms that deter rogue actors due to a competitiveness obsession last seen in the lead-up to the 2008 financial crisis.
"History may serve as a caution. And history might end up repeating itself given the present economic climate and rule-breaking, as he put it.
Additionally, Brussels has issued a warning that the City would stay isolated from the EU if Britain significantly departs from EU regulations.
However, the main area of divergence so far has been the speed of capital market changes, with the EU moving more quickly despite Britain's desire for "nimbler" regulators.
Britain has taken its time to observe how the EU overhauls insurers, controls digital assets, and outsources crucial banking services. It has also put off implementing new bank capital regulations in order to comply with the EU's schedule, further undercutting the idea of "Big Bang 2.0."
Reynolds added that while "the Bill allows the regulators to clean up the inherited-EU laws," it "doesn't provide for the means and criteria they should use to do so."
However, Britain has deviated from the EU in some ways, such as dropping restrictions on "dark" or off-exchange stock trading to draw in more foreign investors and lowering capital buffers at insurers to promote domestic infrastructure investment as a litmus test of Britain's commitment to utilizing Brexit "freedoms."
Markus Ferber, a prominent member of the European Parliament, thinks the UK measures would eventually amount to a significant deregulation agenda, thereby blocking future entry for the UK financial industry to the EU.
According to Ferber, "The Financial Services Bill is a clear statement that the UK is out to compete with the EU for financial services industry."
Real-time News
