• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On January 19th, Shanghai Petrochemical announced that it expects a net loss attributable to shareholders of the parent company of approximately RMB 1.289 billion to RMB 1.576 billion in 2025, compared to a loss in the same period of 2024. The estimated net loss attributable to shareholders of the parent company after deducting non-recurring gains and losses is approximately RMB 1.28 billion to RMB 1.564 billion. In the same period of 2024, the net profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company was RMB 317 million, and the net profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company after deducting non-recurring gains and losses was RMB 338 million. The main reason for the expected loss in 2025 is that international crude oil prices are generally trending downwards, product market demand has not improved significantly, the gross profit margin of the companys main refining products has shrunk, and the total volume of goods sold has decreased due to the major overhaul of the companys production facilities in the fourth quarter. These factors combined have led to the companys operating loss.According to Hong Kong Stock Exchange filings, Xiaomi Group repurchased 4 million Class B shares on January 19, spending approximately HK$150 million.On January 19th, the Nanjing Municipal Government website released the "Nanjing Municipal Online Ride-Hailing Service Management Measures." Addressing issues such as "opaque commission rates" charged by ride-hailing platforms, the measures stipulate that platforms must publicly disclose their maximum commission rates and, after each order is completed, list the "total amount paid by the passenger, the drivers actual income, and the commission" on the drivers end. If the commission exceeds the limit, the driver can file a complaint. The measures will take effect on February 14th. This is the first systematic revision of Nanjings initial ride-hailing management measures since their implementation in 2017. Compared to the old version, the measures lower several "thresholds." Regarding vehicles, the entry requirements have been relaxed from "initial registration" to "no more than 2 years since initial registration," and additional requirements such as "electronic stability control systems" have been removed. Regarding drivers, the clause requiring "Nanjing household registration or residence permit" has been deleted.The final reading of the Eurozones core CPI annual rate for December was 2.3%, in line with expectations and unchanged from the previous reading.The final reading of the Eurozones core CPI for December was 0.2%, unchanged from the previous month.

The Ultimate Guide to Commingled Funds

Drake Hampton

Mar 25, 2022 14:46

How Is a Commingled Fund Defined? 

A commingled fund is a portfolio that combines assets from many accounts. Commingled funds exist to eliminate the administrative overhead associated with handling constituent accounts separately.

 

Commingled funds are a sort of pooled investment vehicle that is neither publicly traded or accessible to normal investors. Rather than that, they are employed in closed pension funds, insurance policies, and other institutional accounts.


截屏2022-03-25 下午2.47.34.png

Recognize a Commingled Fund

Commingling is the process of pooling investors' assets into a single fund or investment vehicle. Commingling is a fundamental characteristic of the majority of investment funds. Additionally, it may be used to aggregate diverse forms of donations for a variety of reasons.

 

Commingled funds are comparable to mutual funds in many aspects. Both are managed professionally by one or more fund managers and invest in fundamental financial products such as stocks, bonds, or a mix of the two.

 

Additionally, commingled fund investments, like mutual funds, benefit from economies of scale, which reduce trading costs per dollar invested, and diversity, which reduces portfolio risk. 

Commingled Funds Supervision

One significant distinction is that commingled funds are not regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which means they are exempt from a range of onerous disclosure requirements. On the other hand, mutual funds are required to register with the SEC and adhere to the Investment Company Act of 1940.

 

Commingled funds, on the other hand, are not fully unregulated: they are subject to examination by the United States Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and specific state regulators.

 

While mutual funds require investors to read a prospectus, commingled funds need investors to read a Summary Plan Description (SPD). SPDs provide further information about the fund, including its objectives, investing strategy, and management team. The SPD document outlines the rights and responsibilities of plan members and beneficiaries. Every investor in a commingled fund should thoroughly read the SPD.

The Benefits and Drawbacks of Commingled Funds

Due to the lesser degree of regulation, a commingled fund's legal and operating costs are reduced. The fewer the costs, the less a fund's returns are impacted. If a commingled fund and a comparable mutual fund have the same gross performance, the commingled fund's net return is expected to be higher due to its reduced expenditures.

 

Commingled funds have the drawback of not having ticker symbols and not being publicly traded. Outside investors may find it difficult to follow the fund's capital gains, dividends, and interest income due to this lack of available information. This information is significantly more visible in the case of mutual funds.

 

A Commingled Fund is an illustration of this type of fund.

 

As with a mutual fund, the Fidelity Contrafund Commingled Pool is managed by a portfolio manager and makes essential information available to the public via quarterly reports. It invests primarily in large-cap growth stocks, with an emphasis on information technology, communication services, consumer discretionary, financials, and health care.

 

The Contrafund Commingled Pool's cost ratio of 0.43 percent is lower than the average expense ratio of mutual funds—including its mutual fund equivalent, the Fidelity Contrafund, which has an expense ratio of.86 percent. Since its launch in 2014, the fund has had an annualized return of 15.85 percent, compared to the S&P 500 index's 14.12 percent.