• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On August 2, Alexei Pushkov, a member of the Constitutional Committee of the Russian Federation Council, stated that the world cannot replace the amount of oil supplied by Russia, which accounts for about 10% of the global oil supply. Pushkov wrote on his social platform: "Despite Trumps warning of imposing high secondary sanctions tariffs, Indian refineries continue to purchase Russian oil. The Indian side explained that if the global market stops accepting 9.5 million barrels of oil per day from Russia, oil prices may rise to $135-140 per barrel. In fact, such a large amount of oil supply cannot be replaced at all, because Russia accounts for about 10% of the global oil supply."According to Argus on August 2, the eight core OPEC+ members will decide on August 3rd whether to fully exit their 2.2 million barrels per day (bpd) crude oil production cuts in September or adopt a more cautious approach due to heightened supply and demand uncertainty. The group has already decided to implement approximately 80% of its planned 2.46 million bpd production increase (including a 300,000 bpd adjustment to the UAEs quota). Market expectations are for another 548,000 bpd increase in September, matching the accelerated increase in August and restoring production 12 months earlier than originally planned. One delegate confirmed his countrys support for completing the full production increase in September, a move long advocated by several major members, particularly given that some countries have been producing above their quotas. However, due to concerns about oil prices, at least one member favored a cautious approach, suggesting that the 548,000 bpd increase be split into smaller adjustments of 137,000 bpd per month from September to December.On August 2nd, Federal Reserve Board Governor Kugler abruptly announced his resignation on Friday, giving US President Trump an opportunity to fill the Fed vacancy earlier than expected and potentially forcing him to finalize his next chairmanship months in advance. Derek Tang, an economist at the monetary policy analysis firm LH Meyer, said, "The ball is now in Trumps court. He has been pressuring the Fed to install his own candidate. Now his opportunity has arrived." While Powells term as chairman ends in May of next year, his term as a governor runs until 2028. If Powell doesnt voluntarily resign as a governor, Trump wont have another chance to fill the vacancy before 2028. In this scenario, Trump might be forced to fill Kuglers vacancy with a candidate he plans to promote as chairman. Tobin Marcus, head of US policy and political strategy at Wolfe Research, noted, "The key is that this is the only vacancy Trump can fill. If he wants to find the next Fed chair from outside, the nomination could be announced earlier."On August 2nd, Canadas retaliatory tariff increase against the United States earlier this year is leading the Trump administration to adopt a differentiated trade strategy with Mexico. Previously, Canada and Mexico enjoyed equal treatment—both were subject to a 25% base tariff and enjoyed extensive duty-free access under the USMCA. However, this situation took a sudden turn on Thursday: Trump announced a 90-day suspension of tariffs on Mexican goods, while simultaneously raising tariffs on Canadian products to 35%. Existing retaliatory measures have not only failed to curb the escalation of the conflict but have instead prompted even more severe retaliation from the United States. Economist and former Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney has stated that retaliatory measures are limited in effectiveness. In fact, the Canadian government has diluted retaliatory tariffs through numerous exemptions, refrained from retaliating when the US raised steel and aluminum tariffs to 50%, and even eliminated its digital services tax at the request of the US.On August 2, the Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) issued a statement today (August 2) emphasizing that "unless our national rights are fully restored, the most important of which is the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital and full sovereignty, we cannot give up armed resistance."

Silver Price Analysis: Bulls maintain control of the XAGUSD and could target the $22.50 supply zone

Alina Haynes

Nov 11, 2022 17:35

 截屏2022-11-08 下午5.37.02_1024x576.png

 

On Friday, silver extends its breakout momentum through the extremely significant 200-day simple moving average for a second consecutive session. During the early European session, the white metal reaches a five-month high, but struggles to achieve acceptance beyond the $22.00 round-figure threshold. However, the XAGUSD maintains its intraday gains and is currently trading in the $21.85-$21.90 range, up about 0.90% for the day.

 

The overnight rise from levels below $21.00 and subsequent strength above a technically key moving average bolster the likelihood of a near-term advance. However, the RSI (14) on the daily chart is close to entering overbought territory and aggressive bullish traders should proceed with caution. Before positioning for further gains, it is recommended to wait for some near-term consolidation or a slight drop.

 

Nevertheless, the XAGUSD is prepared to surpass $22.00 and may seek to test the next significant barrier near $22.45-$22.50. The aforementioned region represents a dense supply zone and may prove difficult for bulls to penetrate. However, some follow-through purchasing will signal a new breakout and pave the way for a move toward recovering the $23.00 round number. The momentum might eventually propel spot prices to a May swing high in the vicinity of $23.25 to $23.30.

 

In contrast, the daily low around $21.45 that coincides with the 200 DMA breakout point should protect the downside in the short term. Any more decline could be viewed as a buying opportunity and should be limited near $21.00. A decisive breach below might spark technical selling and bring the XAGUSD below the $20.40 support zone. Failure to defend the previously mentioned support levels could shift the near-term bias toward bearish traders.