• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On March 8th, four sources familiar with the matter told Reuters that Saudi Arabia has informed Iran that while it supports a diplomatic solution to the conflict between Iran and the United States, it may take appropriate measures in response if Iran continues to attack Saudi Arabia and its energy sector. The sources revealed that two days prior, the Saudi Foreign Minister met with the Iranian Foreign Minister and clearly articulated Riyadhs position. The sources indicated that Saudi Arabia is willing to accept any mediation approach aimed at de-escalating the situation and reaching a solution through negotiations. They also emphasized that Riyadh and other Gulf states have never allowed the United States to use their airspace or territory to launch airstrikes against Iran.On March 8th, local time, on the evening of the 7th, Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps spokesman Naini stated that in the first week after the outbreak of the conflict, the Iranian armed forces implemented a multi-layered offensive strategy. Statistics show that Iran conducted 600 missile strikes, using various types of solid and liquid-fueled ballistic missiles and cruise missiles. In addition, Iran conducted 2,600 drone operations. During these operations, more than 200 sensitive targets located at US military bases and key Israeli facilities were precisely targeted and destroyed. Naini emphasized that the scale of Iranian firepower projection in the first three days of the conflict was equivalent to the total firepower deployed during the entire "12-Day War." Naini also stated that 17 ships belonging to the United States, Israel, and their allies have been attacked.Local news agencies, citing sources from Irans oil ministry, reported that fuel depots in three regions, including Karaj, west of the capital Tehran, were attacked.Irans Supreme National Security Council Secretary Larijani: The United States is already mired in its own miscalculation.Irans Supreme National Security Council Secretary Larijani: Regional countries have realized that the United States can no longer guarantee their security.

New Restrictions Test Canadian Shareholder Activism Next Month

Charlie Brooks

Feb 13, 2023 14:04

微信截图_20230213115951.png


A recent rise in Canada's shareholder activism faces a reality check next month when a new law that offers more rights to investors to pick board nominees will be put to the test and could spark more campaigns this year, attorneys warn.


Canada's regulatory climate is ideal for activists, but it has failed to draw large numbers of activists to its shores.


The country has behind the rising trend of activism seen globally, but that could be set to change, lawyers believe. Data from Insightia, a brand of Diligent, revealed that 53 Canadian corporations faced activism campaigns in 2022, a 17.8% increase over the previous year, compared to a 10.6% increase to 511 in the United States.


Last August, Canada updated federal legislation allowing investors to vote 'for' or 'against' any director nominated to a company board. Previously, shareholders could merely vote 'for' a candidate or 'withhold' their vote, meaning a majority was not legally a need.


While not established in law, majority voting was widely implemented by firms in their policy, previous to the change. According to attorneys, directors were not previously required by law to retire if they failed to achieve a majority of "for" votes.


"If I were an activist, this makes things easier," said Heidi Reinhart, partner at Norton Rose Fulbright.


Reinhart said if an investor suddenly calls for a 'against' campaign and collects enough votes, the individual doesn't get elected. "So, I think there will be more focused efforts against specific directors. That gives some leverage to a shareholder," Reinhart remarked.


While the rule change came in August, lawyers note that this is the first proxy season where the amendment will be tested.


Next month, Luxor Capital Group and Sandpiper Group's activist campaigns against Ritchie Bros (NYSE:RBA) Auctioneers and First Capital Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), respectively, will be subject to investor scrutiny.


Luxor opposes Ritchie Bros' $6 billion acquisition of IAA (NYSE:IAA) Inc, whereas Sandpiper seeks to restructure the board of First Capital REIT.


After losing an average of 17.23% in 2022, activist hedge funds are expected to be further emboldened after betting on global M&A deals netted them an outsized 8.5% gain in January, making them the best-performing strategy for the month.


When it comes to wins and losses, however, only 22% of public activist demands in Canada were at least partially satisfied in 2022, lower than 26% in the U.S. and 34.1% in Europe, according to Insightia.


Canadian campaigns were more successful in the preceding four years, with a rate of 34% in 2021 and 43% in 2018.


A rise in activism is anticipated to promote deal transparency and boost stock performance.


In the case of Elliott Investment Management asking for a strategic review and board changes at Suncor Energy (NYSE:SU) Inc, for example, the stock has increased by 56% since April, when the activist first revealed its engagement.


In comparison, Canadian energy equities climbed 3.14 percent during the same time period.


And oil and mining corporations could continue to be the industry that faces agitation, warn market participants.


"There are a lot of resource firms (in Canada) and those industries typically face dislocation and they're often encountering issues in their business," said Adam Givertz, partner at legal firm Paul Weiss.


"Those issues, (even) if they're a reputable corporation, can attract the attention of an activist."