• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On April 30th, Madison Faller, Global Investment Strategist at JPMorgan Private Bank, stated that the Bank of Englands decision to hold rates steady today was not surprising, but investors should not confuse consensus with confidence. The market may have misinterpreted the balance of risks. Risk is two-way. However, the speed and volatility of the repricing from rate cuts to rate hikes suggest that investors are overestimating the inflationary risks from the energy shock while underestimating the downside risks to growth. We believe that recent movements in UK government bonds (especially in the short to mid-yield curve) and the pound have been somewhat overdone. We believe investors should position themselves now, rather than chasing a hawkish narrative.On April 30th, David Rees, Global Head of Economics at Schroders, stated that the Bank of Englands decision to keep interest rates unchanged reflects its hawkish stance. With overall inflation at 3.3%, wage growth has only gradually slowed, and services inflation remains sticky. The risk lies in the possibility that this shock could become more persistent. A second wave of risk exists later this year if energy shortages translate into food price pressures. Rising fuel and shipping costs, coupled with renewed pressure on inputs such as fertilizers, could lagged behind in pushing up grocery inflation. The risk of persistently high inflation, coupled with speculation about political upheaval following local elections, has pushed UK gilt yields to near 20-year highs. Even so, the threshold for raising interest rates remains high. Given some slack in the labor market and the potential for weaker growth if supply disruptions persist, we doubt the Bank of England will tighten policy unless economic activity remains strong enough to absorb the impact of a rate hike.On April 30th, the Bank of England voted 8-1 to keep the benchmark interest rate at 3.75%. Chief Economist Peale was the only member to vote against it, but other members hinted they might join him at future meetings. Due to the high unpredictability of the Iranian conflict, the Bank of England abandoned its core inflation forecast, instead setting three scenarios based on different paths of energy prices and the effects of a second round of inflation. All three scenarios indicated a need for an interest rate hike: the most pessimistic scenario predicted oil prices would remain around $130 per barrel—a level already reached before Thursdays rate decision. Under this scenario, models used to illustrate the potential impact of monetary policy pointed to a larger rate hike, between 66 and 151 basis points.Bank of England Governor Bailey will hold a monetary policy press conference in ten minutes.Daxin Securities: Raises its target price for Amazon (AMZN.O) from $285 to $310.

Indian Regulatory Body SEBI Ceases “Celebrity Endorsement” for Crypto

Cory Russell

May 18, 2022 09:53

微信截图_20220518094648.png


The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) 

suggested to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance last month that no notable public personalities, including celebrities and athletes, should be permitted to promote cryptocurrencies in India.


"There will be no high-profile promotion"


Although cryptocurrency has been around for years in India, it is still in its infancy in terms of regulation.


Furthermore, owing to the absence of an oversight authority, the SEBI is responsible for all legal matters and decision-making.


As a result, the regulatory authority has recommended that broad marketing of an asset class that is presently unregulated and unrecognized be avoided.


The SEBI also urged that the advertising disclosure include the potential for legal violations as a result of the widespread usage of cryptocurrency (Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc.).


"Given that crypto goods are unregulated, famous public personalities like celebrities, athletes, etc. or their voice should not be utilized for endorsement/advertisement of crypto products," a source reported SEBI as saying.


In addition, the regulatory authority recommended including a statement that "dealings in crypto goods may result in punishment for probable violations of Indian laws such as FEMA, BUDS Act, PMLA, and others."


"Since this is a risky category (VDAs), celebrities or prominent personalities who appear in such advertisements must take special care to ensure that they have done their due diligence about the statements and claims made in the advertisement, so as not to mislead consumers," according to the original guidelines. This is why the SEBI is also looking to end the use of celebrities for crypto endorsing.

India and Bitcoin

The administration has already had run-ins with the crypto community.


However, after noting the growing popularity of cryptocurrencies in India, the Finance Ministry decided to impose a 30% tax on cryptocurrency transactions.


The decision was made without any legislation or regulatory authority.


According to reports, the country's Goods and Service Tax (GST) Council is considering levying an extra 28 percent tax on all cryptocurrency-related activity.


Although no official confirmation has been received, the country's crypto community is concerned about the future of digital assets in India.