• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
Ukrainian President Zelensky: The Ukrainian military attacked a sanctioned Russian container ship named YANINA, which has a deadweight tonnage of over 100,000 tons.According to Interfax news agency, Russian troops have also taken control of the village of Lyubitsk in the Zaporizhzhia region of Ukraine.According to Interfax news agency, Russian troops have taken control of the village of Olgievka in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine.August 1st - According to US sources on July 31st, during his recent visit to the US, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy requested that US President Donald Trump and other US officials persuade SpaceX founder Elon Musk to allow the Ukrainian military to use SpaceXs Starlink satellite internet system to strike ballistic missile launchers within Russia. Currently, Russia has begun deploying a low-orbit satellite system similar to Starlink. On July 31st, multiple sources indicated that Zelenskyy held a closed-door meeting with Trump at the White House on July 28th, making the aforementioned request in person. According to Zelenskyy, Ukraine needs to conduct "more precise strikes" against Russian ballistic missile launchers before winter to prevent Russia from launching a winter offensive and intensifying its attacks on Ukrainian energy facilities.On August 1, Geely Automobile Group announced that its July sales reached 250,161 vehicles, setting a new record for the same period; overseas export sales reached 107,000 vehicles, setting a new monthly record; new energy vehicle sales reached 160,165 vehicles, a year-on-year increase of 23%; and new energy vehicle export sales reached 62,604 vehicles, a year-on-year increase of 616%.

Hershey, Nestle, and Cargill win the dismissal of a claim of child slavery in the United States

Charlie Brooks

Jun 29, 2022 11:06


Tuesday, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. dismissed a case brought by eight Malians claiming child slavery on Ivory Coast cocoa plantations against Hershey Co (NYSE:HSY), Nestle SA (SIX:NESN), Cargill Inc, and others.


U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich determined that the proposed class action plaintiffs lacked legal standing to sue because they failed to prove a "traceable nexus" between the seven defendant companies and the individual farms where the plaintiffs worked.


She added that the plaintiffs did not adequately explain the role of intermediaries in the cocoa supply chain, and that the companies did not oversee actions in "free zones" where 70 to 80 percent of cocoa is farmed.


Mali and Ivory Coast share a border in West Africa.


The plaintiffs claimed they were trafficked as children after being approached by strangers who promised them employment for which they would be compensated, but did not pay them, threatened them with starvation if they did not work, and forced them to live in squalor.


Their attorney, Terry Collingsworth, said that the plaintiffs plan to file an appeal to "compel the businesses to keep their agreements and put an end to this dreadful system they have created."


Other defendants included Mars Inc, Mondelez International Inc (NASDAQ:MDLZ), Barry Callebaut AG, and Olam International Ltd.


In court filings, the seven defendants said that they "strongly abhor the practice of forced labor" and that they were addressing non-forced child labor in cocoa supply chains.


However, they contended that the plaintiffs' too broad legal theory may hold too many parties liable for forced child labor, including consumers and merchants who would benefit from lower prices.


In accordance with the Reauthorization of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, the plaintiffs filed suit.


The Supreme Court of the United States rejected a similar case brought by six Malians against Cargill and Nestle under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 in June of last year.


This was the most recent in a line of judgments denying access to federal courts based on human rights breaches occurring outside the United States.


Coubaly et al. v. Cargill Inc. et al., U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, case number 21-00386.