• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On February 25th, HP (HPQ.N) stated that its full-year earnings may reach the lower end of its previously forecast range due to tariffs and rising memory chip prices. The stock fell approximately 7% in after-hours trading after closing at $18.20 in New York. Over the past 12 months, the stock has fallen by 48%. HP and other device manufacturers are facing the dual challenges of rising memory chip prices and supply shortages as consumers buy new computers to replace outdated devices and acquire new AI capabilities. The company stated that the memory issue will persist throughout the fiscal year and may extend into the next. HP said it is raising product prices, working to bring in more suppliers, and adjusting some products to reduce memory demand. The company said today that it has made progress in these areas, including completing the certification of new suppliers. HP announced the launch of a multi-year cost-cutting plan aimed at saving the company $1 billion annually by 2028.Japans corporate services price index rose 2.6% year-on-year in January, up from 2.60% in the previous month.Japans corporate services price index fell 0.5% month-on-month in January, compared with 0% in the previous month.February 25th - Traders in the US futures and options markets are increasingly betting that the Federal Reserve will continue to cut interest rates next year rather than raise them. The spread of the Covered Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) futures, which is closely linked to Fed policy expectations, is inverting significantly – indicating that traders are beginning to anticipate a longer period of central bank easing. Previously, traders had been betting that the Fed would cut rates twice by 25 basis points before the end of this year and then resume rate hikes in 2027. However, the increasingly heated debate surrounding the impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market has prompted them to reassess this expectation. Jack McIntyre, portfolio manager at Brandywine Global, stated, "The question is how AI will cause inflation. The only aspect of AI that could potentially cause inflation is the construction of data centers and the associated energy demand." Meanwhile, in the spot market, traders lack confidence in how to allocate US Treasuries. JPMorgan Chases latest client survey (for the week ending February 23rd) shows that neutral positions have reached their highest level since the end of 2024.February 25th - New revisions to Japans corporate governance guidelines could release some of the $840 billion in cash held by listed companies and fuel a new wave of buying in the Japanese stock market. The Financial Services Agency (FSA) will submit draft rules to an expert panel on Thursday, requiring companies to verify the efficiency of their cash usage, with the aim of implementing this change this year. Despite significant improvements in corporate governance in recent years, Japanese companies still have a large amount of idle cash on their balance sheets. Investing these funds in higher-yielding projects could potentially enhance the attractiveness of the Japanese stock market to investors. Sho Nakazawa, equity strategist at Morgan Stanley Mitsubishi UFJ Securities, stated, "This revision will make it easier to anticipate increased allocations to growth sectors, as well as more stable growth in share buybacks and dividends," which in turn could lead to capital inflows from overseas investors. Analysts have long argued that excessive cash holdings by Japanese companies are one of the factors hindering improvements in return on equity (ROE), a key metric closely watched by stock investors, which has caused Japans ROE to lag behind its Western counterparts.

Hershey, Nestle, and Cargill win the dismissal of a claim of child slavery in the United States

Charlie Brooks

Jun 29, 2022 11:06


Tuesday, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. dismissed a case brought by eight Malians claiming child slavery on Ivory Coast cocoa plantations against Hershey Co (NYSE:HSY), Nestle SA (SIX:NESN), Cargill Inc, and others.


U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich determined that the proposed class action plaintiffs lacked legal standing to sue because they failed to prove a "traceable nexus" between the seven defendant companies and the individual farms where the plaintiffs worked.


She added that the plaintiffs did not adequately explain the role of intermediaries in the cocoa supply chain, and that the companies did not oversee actions in "free zones" where 70 to 80 percent of cocoa is farmed.


Mali and Ivory Coast share a border in West Africa.


The plaintiffs claimed they were trafficked as children after being approached by strangers who promised them employment for which they would be compensated, but did not pay them, threatened them with starvation if they did not work, and forced them to live in squalor.


Their attorney, Terry Collingsworth, said that the plaintiffs plan to file an appeal to "compel the businesses to keep their agreements and put an end to this dreadful system they have created."


Other defendants included Mars Inc, Mondelez International Inc (NASDAQ:MDLZ), Barry Callebaut AG, and Olam International Ltd.


In court filings, the seven defendants said that they "strongly abhor the practice of forced labor" and that they were addressing non-forced child labor in cocoa supply chains.


However, they contended that the plaintiffs' too broad legal theory may hold too many parties liable for forced child labor, including consumers and merchants who would benefit from lower prices.


In accordance with the Reauthorization of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, the plaintiffs filed suit.


The Supreme Court of the United States rejected a similar case brought by six Malians against Cargill and Nestle under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 in June of last year.


This was the most recent in a line of judgments denying access to federal courts based on human rights breaches occurring outside the United States.


Coubaly et al. v. Cargill Inc. et al., U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, case number 21-00386.