• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
Bank of America Global Research: Raises its price target for Alphabet (GOOG.O) from $370 to $430.Bank of America Global Research: Raises its price target for Amazon (AMZN.O) from $298 to $310.The Kremlin stated that the start and end dates of the Victory Day ceasefire will be decided by President Putin.1. Commerzbank: Expects the Bank of England to hold rates steady. Market expectations for a rate hike before the end of the year appear excessive, posing a risk to the pound. 2. BNP Paribas: Expects the Bank of England to hold rates steady. Inflationary pressures from high energy prices may prompt the Bank of England to raise rates twice in 2026. 3. MUFG: Expects the Bank of England to hold rates steady, but will hint at future rate hikes due to strengthening UK economic growth momentum and underlying inflationary pressures. 4. UBS: Expects the Bank of England to hold rates steady. The meeting will focus on evidence of second-round effects, such as changes in wage and pricing behavior, and how monetary policy should respond. 5. Berenberg: Expects the Bank of England to keep rates unchanged throughout 2026, followed by a resumption of rate cuts, as a weak UK economy and a slowing labor market will curb soaring inflation. 6. Morgan Stanley: Expects the Bank of England to hold rates steady by an 8-1 vote and will provide policy guidance on the possible direction of future rate decisions. 7. ING: Expects the Bank of England to maintain its interest rate unchanged at an 8-to-1 vote and keep the options open, neither increasing bets on rate hikes nor actively suppressing expectations. 8. PIMCO: Expects the Bank of England to keep interest rates unchanged until 2026, but may raise rates to prevent inflation from surging if energy prices rise further.April 30th - According to US financial media Semafor, two White House officials revealed that US President Trump will sign an executive order on Thursday aimed at expanding access for employees whose employers do not offer retirement savings plans. The US government will combine this measure with the so-called "Savers Match" program. This program stems from legislation in 2022, which stipulates that starting next year, the federal government will provide up to $1,000 in matching funds for retirement savings plan contributions from employees earning less than $35,000 annually. One official stated that Thursdays executive order aims to address this issue, instructing the Treasury Department to launch a new website, TrumpIRA.gov, before the "Savers Match" program takes effect in January. Under the executive order, employees can use the website to filter private sector retirement savings plans based on factors such as cost, minimum contribution amount, and minimum balance to register for an eligible account and receive matching funds when eligible.

Hershey, Nestle, and Cargill win the dismissal of a claim of child slavery in the United States

Charlie Brooks

Jun 29, 2022 11:06


Tuesday, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. dismissed a case brought by eight Malians claiming child slavery on Ivory Coast cocoa plantations against Hershey Co (NYSE:HSY), Nestle SA (SIX:NESN), Cargill Inc, and others.


U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich determined that the proposed class action plaintiffs lacked legal standing to sue because they failed to prove a "traceable nexus" between the seven defendant companies and the individual farms where the plaintiffs worked.


She added that the plaintiffs did not adequately explain the role of intermediaries in the cocoa supply chain, and that the companies did not oversee actions in "free zones" where 70 to 80 percent of cocoa is farmed.


Mali and Ivory Coast share a border in West Africa.


The plaintiffs claimed they were trafficked as children after being approached by strangers who promised them employment for which they would be compensated, but did not pay them, threatened them with starvation if they did not work, and forced them to live in squalor.


Their attorney, Terry Collingsworth, said that the plaintiffs plan to file an appeal to "compel the businesses to keep their agreements and put an end to this dreadful system they have created."


Other defendants included Mars Inc, Mondelez International Inc (NASDAQ:MDLZ), Barry Callebaut AG, and Olam International Ltd.


In court filings, the seven defendants said that they "strongly abhor the practice of forced labor" and that they were addressing non-forced child labor in cocoa supply chains.


However, they contended that the plaintiffs' too broad legal theory may hold too many parties liable for forced child labor, including consumers and merchants who would benefit from lower prices.


In accordance with the Reauthorization of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, the plaintiffs filed suit.


The Supreme Court of the United States rejected a similar case brought by six Malians against Cargill and Nestle under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 in June of last year.


This was the most recent in a line of judgments denying access to federal courts based on human rights breaches occurring outside the United States.


Coubaly et al. v. Cargill Inc. et al., U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, case number 21-00386.