• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On May 11, it was announced at a press conference held by the General Administration of Customs that, in order to uphold the bottom line of safety for imported and exported cosmetics and effectively protect the safety of cosmetics used by the general public, the General Administration of Customs recently released the newly revised "Measures of the Customs of the Peoples Republic of China for the Supervision and Administration of Inspection and Quarantine of Imported and Exported Cosmetics." These measures will take effect on December 1 this year. Li Jinsong, Director of the Import and Export Food Safety Bureau of the General Administration of Customs, stated that this revision widely solicited opinions from the public, relevant enterprises, industry associations, and the National Medical Products Administration, and also followed international rules by notifying the World Trade Organization (WTO). Overall, the revision presents three main characteristics: first, strengthening collaborative supervision across the entire supply chain to solidify the national border defense line; second, deepening institutional reform and innovation to improve the level of cross-border trade facilitation; and third, supporting the development of new business models to continuously accumulate momentum for reform.White House National Economic Council Director Hassett: The system is currently functioning well, and artificial intelligence products are being rolled out.White House National Economic Council Director Hassett: Its too early to talk about government action on artificial intelligence rules.S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 futures extended their losses, currently down about 0.15%, following reports that Iran had deployed submarines.White House National Economic Council Director Hassett: High energy prices are highly unlikely to cause a U.S. economic recession.

Hershey, Nestle, and Cargill win the dismissal of a claim of child slavery in the United States

Charlie Brooks

Jun 29, 2022 11:06


Tuesday, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. dismissed a case brought by eight Malians claiming child slavery on Ivory Coast cocoa plantations against Hershey Co (NYSE:HSY), Nestle SA (SIX:NESN), Cargill Inc, and others.


U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich determined that the proposed class action plaintiffs lacked legal standing to sue because they failed to prove a "traceable nexus" between the seven defendant companies and the individual farms where the plaintiffs worked.


She added that the plaintiffs did not adequately explain the role of intermediaries in the cocoa supply chain, and that the companies did not oversee actions in "free zones" where 70 to 80 percent of cocoa is farmed.


Mali and Ivory Coast share a border in West Africa.


The plaintiffs claimed they were trafficked as children after being approached by strangers who promised them employment for which they would be compensated, but did not pay them, threatened them with starvation if they did not work, and forced them to live in squalor.


Their attorney, Terry Collingsworth, said that the plaintiffs plan to file an appeal to "compel the businesses to keep their agreements and put an end to this dreadful system they have created."


Other defendants included Mars Inc, Mondelez International Inc (NASDAQ:MDLZ), Barry Callebaut AG, and Olam International Ltd.


In court filings, the seven defendants said that they "strongly abhor the practice of forced labor" and that they were addressing non-forced child labor in cocoa supply chains.


However, they contended that the plaintiffs' too broad legal theory may hold too many parties liable for forced child labor, including consumers and merchants who would benefit from lower prices.


In accordance with the Reauthorization of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, the plaintiffs filed suit.


The Supreme Court of the United States rejected a similar case brought by six Malians against Cargill and Nestle under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 in June of last year.


This was the most recent in a line of judgments denying access to federal courts based on human rights breaches occurring outside the United States.


Coubaly et al. v. Cargill Inc. et al., U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, case number 21-00386.