• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
September 9th - It was learned from the United States on September 8th local time that the US military struck targets near Irans Kharg Island and the port city of Jask. An anonymous senior US official stated that the targets included Iranian oil tankers. On the evening of the 8th local time, Iranian sources reported that an Iranian oil tanker was attacked by US missiles about four miles from Kharg Island. Local sources stated that there were no casualties and the tankers crew was being evacuated. Relevant departments are investigating the specific circumstances of the incident.U.S. officials say that in response to Iran’s repeated missile attacks on U.S. Navy warships, the U.S. military has struck several Iranian oil tankers linked to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.On September 9th, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kalas posted on social media that all EU member states agree that Israeli settlements in the West Bank violate international law. The Israeli governments settlement expansion in the West Bank is undermining the prospects of the two-state solution. Kalas reiterated the EUs firm commitment to supporting a comprehensive, just, and lasting peace based on the two-state solution. On the same day, 12 countries, including the UK, France, and Canada, issued a joint statement making commitments to restrict trade with Israeli settlements.Broadcom (AVGO.O) CEO: Capital allocation may focus on increasing dividends and share buybacks.The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down 626.72 points, or 1.17%, at 52,787.53 on Tuesday, September 8; the S&P 500 closed down 44.98 points, or 0.58%, at 7,673.62; and the Nasdaq Composite closed down 85.58 points, or 0.32%, at 26,421.41.

Hershey, Nestle, and Cargill win the dismissal of a claim of child slavery in the United States

Charlie Brooks

Jun 29, 2022 11:06


Tuesday, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. dismissed a case brought by eight Malians claiming child slavery on Ivory Coast cocoa plantations against Hershey Co (NYSE:HSY), Nestle SA (SIX:NESN), Cargill Inc, and others.


U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich determined that the proposed class action plaintiffs lacked legal standing to sue because they failed to prove a "traceable nexus" between the seven defendant companies and the individual farms where the plaintiffs worked.


She added that the plaintiffs did not adequately explain the role of intermediaries in the cocoa supply chain, and that the companies did not oversee actions in "free zones" where 70 to 80 percent of cocoa is farmed.


Mali and Ivory Coast share a border in West Africa.


The plaintiffs claimed they were trafficked as children after being approached by strangers who promised them employment for which they would be compensated, but did not pay them, threatened them with starvation if they did not work, and forced them to live in squalor.


Their attorney, Terry Collingsworth, said that the plaintiffs plan to file an appeal to "compel the businesses to keep their agreements and put an end to this dreadful system they have created."


Other defendants included Mars Inc, Mondelez International Inc (NASDAQ:MDLZ), Barry Callebaut AG, and Olam International Ltd.


In court filings, the seven defendants said that they "strongly abhor the practice of forced labor" and that they were addressing non-forced child labor in cocoa supply chains.


However, they contended that the plaintiffs' too broad legal theory may hold too many parties liable for forced child labor, including consumers and merchants who would benefit from lower prices.


In accordance with the Reauthorization of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, the plaintiffs filed suit.


The Supreme Court of the United States rejected a similar case brought by six Malians against Cargill and Nestle under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 in June of last year.


This was the most recent in a line of judgments denying access to federal courts based on human rights breaches occurring outside the United States.


Coubaly et al. v. Cargill Inc. et al., U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, case number 21-00386.