• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On June 12th, Cui Dongshu, Secretary-General of the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA), stated that the main factors influencing price changes are structural and sales volume changes. Slow sales growth leads to a continuous rise in the average price of passenger cars. The average retail price of passenger cars in 2021 was 165,000 yuan, rising steadily to 184,000 yuan in 2024. The average price of passenger cars in 2025 is 168,000 yuan, a decrease of 16,000 yuan compared to 2024. In May 2026, the average price of passenger cars is 173,000 yuan, an increase of 4,000 yuan compared to the same period last year.June 12 - From January to May this year, the national railway completed 248.5 billion yuan in fixed asset investment, a year-on-year increase of 2.6%, effectively leveraging the driving role of railway construction investment and providing strong support for expanding domestic demand in all aspects and enhancing the endogenous driving force of economic and social development.On June 12th, JD.coms first mall in Shanghai, the JD Mall Qibao store, opened in the Qibao commercial district of Minhang District. The store, with a floor area of nearly 50,000 square meters, features 200 leading global brands, over 200,000 JD.com self-operated products, and also introduces the worlds first offline experience store for the AI-powered robotics company, JAVA. By the end of this years JD.com 618 shopping festival, JD.com Mall will have a total of 30 operating stores nationwide. JD.com Malls first store in Hong Kong will also officially open soon.The Hang Seng Tech Index rose more than 2%, with sectors such as semiconductors, storage, optical communications, brain-computer interfaces, and commercial aerospace leading the gains.U.S. officials said the U.S. military shot down two Iranian one-way attack drones.

Hershey, Nestle, and Cargill win the dismissal of a claim of child slavery in the United States

Charlie Brooks

Jun 29, 2022 11:06


Tuesday, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. dismissed a case brought by eight Malians claiming child slavery on Ivory Coast cocoa plantations against Hershey Co (NYSE:HSY), Nestle SA (SIX:NESN), Cargill Inc, and others.


U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich determined that the proposed class action plaintiffs lacked legal standing to sue because they failed to prove a "traceable nexus" between the seven defendant companies and the individual farms where the plaintiffs worked.


She added that the plaintiffs did not adequately explain the role of intermediaries in the cocoa supply chain, and that the companies did not oversee actions in "free zones" where 70 to 80 percent of cocoa is farmed.


Mali and Ivory Coast share a border in West Africa.


The plaintiffs claimed they were trafficked as children after being approached by strangers who promised them employment for which they would be compensated, but did not pay them, threatened them with starvation if they did not work, and forced them to live in squalor.


Their attorney, Terry Collingsworth, said that the plaintiffs plan to file an appeal to "compel the businesses to keep their agreements and put an end to this dreadful system they have created."


Other defendants included Mars Inc, Mondelez International Inc (NASDAQ:MDLZ), Barry Callebaut AG, and Olam International Ltd.


In court filings, the seven defendants said that they "strongly abhor the practice of forced labor" and that they were addressing non-forced child labor in cocoa supply chains.


However, they contended that the plaintiffs' too broad legal theory may hold too many parties liable for forced child labor, including consumers and merchants who would benefit from lower prices.


In accordance with the Reauthorization of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, the plaintiffs filed suit.


The Supreme Court of the United States rejected a similar case brought by six Malians against Cargill and Nestle under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 in June of last year.


This was the most recent in a line of judgments denying access to federal courts based on human rights breaches occurring outside the United States.


Coubaly et al. v. Cargill Inc. et al., U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, case number 21-00386.