• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
According to the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre, a 6.4-magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of Antigua and Barbuda at 10:50 a.m. local time on the 16th. The epicenter was located at 17.2336 degrees north latitude and 61.3383 degrees west longitude, with a focal depth of approximately 70 kilometers. There are currently no reports of casualties or property damage.According to the official measurement of the China Earthquake Networks Center, a magnitude 3.4 earthquake occurred at 22:53 on May 16 in Wuqia County, Kizilsu Kirghiz Autonomous Prefecture, Xinjiang (40.47 degrees north latitude, 74.86 degrees east longitude), with a focal depth of 12 kilometers.The China Earthquake Networks Center automatically determined that an earthquake of approximately magnitude 6.1 occurred near the Leeward Islands (17.56°N, 61.08°W) at 22:50 on May 16. The final result is subject to the official rapid report.On May 16th, according to an official notice, the Indian government has implemented new restrictions on silver imports, changing several categories of silver products from a free import policy to a restricted import policy. Under the revised regulations, the import of silver bars, unwrought silver, and semi-finished silver (including silver powder) now requires government approval. Certain categories of silver imports are also subject to regulations from the Reserve Bank of India. These changes are introduced through revisions to the import policy catalog under the Harmonized System of Trade (HS) of India. This move comes as the Indian government intensifies its efforts to tighten regulations on precious metal imports and control rising import bills. Previously, the Indian central government had increased import duties on gold and silver from 6% to 15%. Simultaneously, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has tightened regulations regarding the duty-free import of gold by jewelry and gemstone exporters under the "pre-authorization" scheme.On May 16, according to a report by the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRNA), a fire broke out at an oil factory in the northwestern Iranian city of Maragay at around 10:00 AM. The Iranian Red Crescent website reported that IRNA official Mohammad Hossein Kabadi stated that the organizations rescue personnel immediately rushed to the scene after receiving the fire report to conduct search and rescue operations. As of now, the fire has injured at least 10 people, and the rescue operation is still ongoing.

Australia's highest court decides Google is not liable for defamation

Charlie Brooks

Aug 18, 2022 10:51

1.png


The highest court in Australia reversed a judgment that found Google guilty of defamation for providing a link to a contested newspaper article on Wednesday, focussing attention on how internet libel cases are handled in the country.


The seven-judge panel of the High Court of Australia ruled 5 to 2 to reverse an earlier ruling that the Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Inc subsidiary was involved in the publication of the contentious article by acting as a "library" holding it, stating that the website had no active role.


In Australia, the question of who is responsible for internet-based libel has simmered for years. This decision increases the difficulty. An evaluation of the country's libel law that has lasted years has not yet produced a conclusive answer as to whether Google and Facebook (NASDAQ:META) should be held accountable.


According to the published judgment, the issue stems from a 2004 article alleging that a criminal defense attorney exceeded professional bounds by becoming a "confidant" of criminals. According to the judgment, attorney George Defteros uncovered a connection to the article via a Google search of his name in 2016 and had Google remove it after 150 people viewed it.


A state court determined that Google is a publisher and ordered the company to pay Defteros A$40,000 (US$28,056). Google appealed the conviction, culminating in the verdict issued on Wednesday.


"The Underworld article was not authored by any of the appellant's employees or agents," two panel judges noted in a ruling issued on Wednesday.


"It was written by a journalist unaffiliated with the appellant and published by a newspaper over which the appellant had no influence or control."


Google "does not own or control the internet," they said.


A Google representative was unavailable for immediate comment.


Despite the fact that Google was not found accountable, Defteros felt vindicated because the court agreed that the article was defamatory.


The decision was rendered after the High Court determined last year that a newspaper publisher was liable for defamatory comments posted on Facebook beneath an article it had posted.


The media companies "invited and promoted" comments last year, however Google "did not create a space or area where it could be sent nor did it encourage the drafting of response comments," the judges decided.