• English
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文
  • Tiếng Việt
  • ไทย
  • Indonesia
Subscribe
Real-time News
On August 15th, local time, the Yemeni government forces stated that the Houthi rebels launched six ballistic missiles at the southwestern Yemeni port of Mocha, targeting local civilian and government facilities in an attempt to impose a blockade and exacerbate the plight of the people. On the same day, the Yemeni Ministry of Health issued a statement strongly condemning the Houthi attack on Mocha and warning of serious health and humanitarian consequences. The Ministry of Health called on the United Nations, international organizations, humanitarian agencies, and the international community to condemn the Houthi attacks on civilian and critical infrastructure, protect infrastructure essential to peoples basic needs, ensure the continued delivery of supplies and humanitarian aid, and strengthen emergency health and nutrition assistance to the western coastal regions of Yemen and other affected areas.Yemens health ministry: A missile attack launched by Houthi rebels against Mocha, Yemen, tonight killed one civilian and injured eight others.On August 15th, Broadcoms stock price fell nearly 7% intraday on Friday as the market focused on the financing model behind its AI infrastructure expansion. Bank of America analysts estimate that Broadcoms financing platform for its AI chip customers could accumulate up to $370 billion in senior debt by mid-2029, with new issuances in 2027 alone potentially reaching approximately $150 billion. This estimate is based on a 20-gigawatt data center. The debt is assumed by the financing platform, not directly by Broadcom, but Broadcom has already guaranteed some customer lease payments, with the first guarantee amounting to approximately $29 billion. This financing model began in June of this year, led by Apollo Global Management and Blackstone Group, providing $35 billion in funding for Broadcoms AIXPV platform. The first tranche will support Anthropic in building over 1 gigawatt of computing power, with the platform planned to provide over 20 gigawatts of computing power by 2028. As the AI infrastructure expands, the future scale of Broadcoms guarantees will be a key focus for the market.On August 15th, Tiger Global Management conducted a large-scale portfolio adjustment in the second quarter. Regarding reductions: Broadcom (AVGO.O) was reduced by 51.1% to 1.8 million shares; Google A (GOOGL.O) was reduced by 45.4% to 5.8 million Class A shares; TSMC (TSM.N) was reduced by 12.3% to 4.9 million ADSs; Microsoft (MSFT.O) was reduced by 9.3% to 2.3 million shares; Meta Platforms (META.O) was reduced by 8.5% to 2.8 million Class A shares; Nvidia (NVDA.O) was reduced by 6.8% to 11.2 million shares; and JD.com (JD.O) was reduced by 41.5% to 201,500 ADSs. Regarding increases: Intel (INTC.O) holdings were increased to 4.3 million shares. New positions were established in AMD (AMD.O) with 674,000 shares and SpaceX (SPCX.O) with 375,000 shares. All holdings in Netflix (NFLX.O) were liquidated.According to the Wall Street Journal, JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N) has terminated its banking relationship with Polymarket due to regulatory issues.

Are US tech giants the new Nifty Fifty?

LEO

Oct 25, 2021 13:27

漂亮50封面.jpg

Photo: Internet


The COVID-19 hit the global economy this year, but under the leadership of technology giants such as Apple, Tesla, Amazon, Alphabet, Facebook, and Microsoft, the Nasdaq Index continues to set new record highs. 


Tesla, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and other highfliers now look a lot like the 'Nifty Fifty' bubble stocks of the 1970s.


Nifty Fifty


In the United States, the term Nifty Fifty was an informal designation for fifty popular large-cap stocks on the New York Stock Exchange in the 1960s and 1970s that were widely regarded as solid buy and hold growth stocks or "Blue-chip" stocks. 


These 50 stocks include Coca-Cola, Walt Disney, IBM, Philip Morris, McDonald's, etc.


The world back then was their oyster. These were one-rule stocks — and that rule was to buy them at any price. They were great companies and how much you paid for them was irrelevant until it wasn't.


Dot-com bubble


The dot-com bubble began when internet browser provider Netscape joined the tech-focused Nasdaq stock exchange on 9 August 1995. This loss-making company, which had only been founded in 1994, made its stock market debut at US$ 28 per share. During the first day of trading, the share price hit almost US$ 75 at times. Anything internet related that had '.com' or 'e-' in its name went down a storm with investors from the mid-1990s onwards, regardless of whether there was a robust business model behind it or not. Investors became greedy when faced with making huge gains from the seemingly endless worldwide web.


These inflated expectations reached their peak at the start of 2000. The Nasdaq Composite index had grown fivefold in five years. 


When the tech bubble finally burst in March 2000, trillions of market value went up in smoke. In this phase of disillusionment, the Nasdaq fell by almost 80% and closed at 1,114.11 points on 9 October 2002.


Dot-com bubble 2.0?


At their peak, the Nifty Fifty comprised almost all the gains of the S&P 500. If that fact sounds eerily familiar,  that's because today's Nifty Fifty are Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Alphabet, Microsoft, and Tesla.


Just like the Nifty Fifty of yore, these stocks are dominant companies of their day. They touch every aspect of our lives. Also, they have strong brand strength, frantic buying by investors.


Like a SpaceX rocket lofting a Tesla Roadster into orbit, Tesla stock is on a vertical trip into outer space. 


In 2019, Tesla's stock price has risen by about 800%, and it has risen by more than 330% since the beginning of 2020. Some analysts believe that Tesla is 'one of the most dangerous stocks' on Wall Street.


特斯拉股价.png

Photo: Finviz


The debate over Tesla's stock price has never stopped.


Tesla stock bulls typically argue that the company is dominating the nascent global electric vehicle market, and comparing the stock and its valuation to legacy auto stocks is irrelevant. 


Tesla bears often point out that the stock's valuation is extremely high, even compared with high-growth tech stocks, and Tesla will face an unprecedented wave of new competition in the next couple of years.


It may have a wonderful, viable business for many years to come, but the natural competition of the marketplace makes it extraordinarily difficult for any company to remain dominant for perpetuity. That's why valuation matters.


If investors held many of the Nifty Fifty stocks from 1972 to 1992, they would have delivered a decent (10%-plus) return. This sounds great in theory, but most investors would have lost patience after ten years of zero- or negative return. Put another way, the shareholders who bought these stocks in 1972 were most likely not the ones who profited from them in 1992.

The Nifty Fifty showed us that a company's greatness and past growth are not enough is still true. Starting valuation, what you actually pay for a business has always mattered and still does.


Warren Buffett once said that it is wise for investors to be "fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful."